|
![]() E-mail Correspondenc
about articles or issues raised in California Political Review
or
Well done! Paul McCauley
Posted: July 23, 2003 When business ignores politics
Many thanks for William E. Saracinos Business Stake in the Budget Battle (CPR, May/June). Mr. Saracino accurately describes many of us business owners as almost exclusively focused on the nuts and bolts of our businesses while paying little or no attention to politics. Mr. Saracino then powerfully lays out the enormous snare that our inattention has sucked us into: an economic downturn, in the midst of which state government is piling on taxes and, especially, regulations which have hit us like a two- by-four over the head. The article lays out a road map for change. Political ideas and philosophy have consequences. The success of 21st Century Insurances strategy should inspire California business leaders to get in the game in a principled, effective way. I do think that, as a practical matter, the established business groups are ill-equipped to play hardball partisan politics in California. They typically hate to go against incumbents. But what that means is that new groups are needed, set up by business people and pro- business politicians with the guts and smarts to win.
Geoffrey Vanden
Heuvel,
Prison
Guards, Gray Davis and the
Budget Crisis
An element in Californias Contrived Budget Crisis (CPR, May/ June) that ought to be highlighted is Governor Gray Daviss pay hike/ campaign donation interplay with the state prison guards union [California Correctional Peace Officers Association]. During the 2002 campaign, Davis received financial contributions in the seven figure range from the CCPOA union. The governor also approved a very generous salary increase for the guards plus fringe benefits, more paid sick leave days per year, and monthly stipends to maintain physical fitness (completely unmonitored). The cost to the state of this new financial package for the union guards has far exceeded the negotiators estimates. Now the prison guards use their increased sick leave days as supplemental vacation, which must be covered by replacement guards who receive overtime pay. This unholy alliance, in effect, made California taxpayers subsidize the governors re- election campaign by paying more to operate our prisons. This union contract has already become so expensive the governor has tried to renegotiate it. So far, the union has refused to consider doing so. California voters who wish to reduce such state government waste and the influence of special interest groups over politicians might consider a simple solution: a ballot initiative to prohibit state employee unions from contributing to state elected officials or political parties. This would be true campaign finance reform, eliminating a glaring conflict of interest for politicians who, when they negotiate public employees salaries, are supposed to represent the taxpayers who pay those salaries. This measure would protect taxpayers against exploding state operating costs, reduce workers union dues, and free politicians to serve the public interest who are now too often beholden to special interests.
Edward F. Cross
|
CPRSearch California Political Review Coming soon CPR Previous Year Issues in PDF format CPR Online State Political News Sources
|
Copyright
© 2003 by The California Public Policy Foundation,
publisher of California Political Review and CPR Online
Post Office Box 931, Camarillo, CA 93011 | 805/445-9483 | [email protected]
Subscribe to California Political Review: click here