|
![]() Returning the public interest to center stage Yes, Virginia, there is a Mandate Striking
like lightning, the voters have ended the self-absorbed, John Kurzweil is editor of California Political Review. Printer Friendly version
An
article of unshakeable liberal faith states that the voters never really
take sides against liberal ideas and policies. Almost immediately after
October 7, contemplating the biggest Mr. Schwarzenegger ran in a race with no primary, so, consequently shared the ballot with 134 other candidates. Mr. Schwarzenegger received 200,000 more votes than Davis did in 2002. Mr. Schwarzenegger, who shared a landslide 62 percent victory with state Senator Tom McClintock, went to great lengths during the campaign to assure voters that there was virtually nothing to choose between him and the senator on the broad, critical issues of taxes, spending, regulation, and the overall foolishness of trusting big government to run our lives for us. Nearly four and half million Californians (55.4 percent) voted to do something no other majority has supported in state history: dump a sitting governor. Exit polls found Governor Gray Davis holding an approval rating below 25 percent, lower than Nixons when he resigned, but still significantly ahead of the Legislatures 19 percent job approval rating recorded in a July Field poll. Cruz Bustamante, running as an out-and-out liberal (tax increases, drivers licenses for illegals, and so on), received third party levels of support in many heavily-populated counties, failed to break 40 percent even in Democrat stronghold L.A. County, and lost everywhere but the loony-left Bay Area. This is a mandate. The voters want an end to incompetent, ideologically-frenzied, and pay-to-play government. It is true, most of them probably would not specify exactly what they would like to see in its place, and, indeed, they should not. That is the job of political leaders: to identify exactly what is wrong and how to fix it. But the clear mandate of the voters is to restore the public interest as state governments primary concern, which means putting the narrow personal, ideological, and spending lobby interests that dominated Sacramento under Davis back at least into second place. Borrowing a Heritage Foundation phrase employed at the outset of Reagans Presidency: Californians have given the new governor a Mandate for Leadership. So, the question is not: is there a mandate? but, how should we serve it? Schwarzenegger outlined his broad conception of the states problems and their solution in a September 24 Wall Street Journal article titled My Economics. Writing that the two people who have most profoundly impacted my thinking on economics are Milton Friedman and Adam Smith, he summarized what he learned from them as a lesson every political leader should never forget: that when the heavy fist of government becomes too overbearing and intrusive, it stifles the unlimited wealth creation process of a free people operating under a free enterprise system. He then specifically promised (a) to restructure our tax system which he decried as among the highest in the nation, (b) to champion a good spending limit, (c) to overhaul workers comp and generally to reduce businesss regulatory burden, and (d) to de-centralize education. This program is nothing more than a formula to achieve what voters said they wanted October 7: re- establishing the public interest ahead of politicians interests by placing reasonable limits on spending and taxation, after five years grossly irresponsible abuse of both, and saving jobs and the tax base by easing a regulatory regime that is driving business out and under, after five years of Democrats catering to special interest unions and trial lawyers at the publics expense. The new administration, already, as we see, under pressure from the left to forget the mandate, deserves both moral support and the benefit of many minds working on the details of how to do this job well. The several articles that follow begin the discussion and debate, the comparison and contrast of ideas, that will flesh out the broad program the voters have demanded. Because
the new governor proclaims it his own inspiration, we begin with an excerpt
showing the philosophical and logical foundation of the Schwarzenegger
reform from Milton and Rose D. Friedmans landmark 1980 book, Free
to Choose.
|
CPRSearch California Political Review Coming soon CPR BACK ISSUES in PDF format CPR Online State Political News Sources
|
Copyright
© 2003 by The California Public Policy Foundation,
publisher of California Political Review and CPR Online
Post Office Box 931, Camarillo, CA 93011 | 805/445-9483 | [email protected]
Subscribe to California Political Review: click here